🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has developed a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration illustrates how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the current situation of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.